Noescio
Home › Sessions › Prediction and testing

Prediction and testing

Class 9Science Predictions, evidence and testable claimsSession 5 Free

A prediction is an expected result worked out from evidence. A claim becomes testable when it names something that can be measured. Small errors in starting measurements limit how far ahead weather can be forecast.

Laws and models let you calculate ahead

A law or a model states how quantities are related. If you know some of the quantities now, you can calculate others before they are measured. That calculated result is a prediction.

From the laws of motion, you can calculate where a kicked football will land from its launch speed and angle. From a balanced chemical equation, you can calculate how many grams of carbon dioxide 10 g of calcium carbonate gives when heated. In both cases the result is known before the event.

A prediction is different from a guess

A guess has no stated reason. A prediction comes from a stated law or model and from measured starting values. If someone asks why you expect a result, a prediction has an answer; a guess does not.

A prediction is also specific. It says what will be measured and roughly what value is expected. That is what makes it possible to check.

Varsha says: “It will rain this afternoon because the clouds look dark.” What would you measure to turn this into a claim that can be tested?

Measure quantities that have been recorded before past rain: the relative humidity, the air pressure and whether it is falling, the wind speed and direction, and the temperature trend.

Each one gives a number that two people would read the same way. Each can be compared with the values recorded before earlier rain. “The clouds look dark” is a description, and two people could disagree about it.

VAGUE CLAIM “It will rain — the clouds look dark.” ASK TESTABLE QUESTIONS What is the humidity today? Was it above 80% last time it rained? What is the wind speed and direction? Is the temperature dropping as before? All measurable. All comparable with the past. A yes-or-no question (“will it rain?”) closes the door. A measurable one opens it.

From a claim to a test. A useful question names something that can be measured. Two people measuring it should get the same number, and the number can be compared with past records.

When a prediction fails

If the measured result matches the prediction, the law or model has passed one more test. Confidence in it increases.

If the result does not match, something in the chain is wrong. It could be a measurement, an assumption, or the model itself. Scientists check each of these in turn. A failed prediction shows where to look, which is why it often teaches more than a successful one.

Why weather forecasts become less reliable further ahead

A forecast starts from measurements of temperature, pressure, humidity and wind at many places. A computer model then calculates how the atmosphere changes, step by step.

Every measurement has a small error. In the atmosphere, a small difference in the starting values grows larger at each step of the calculation. A system with this property is called chaotic. After about one to two weeks, the growth makes two forecasts that started almost identically completely different.

Watch a forecast drift

Two forecasts start from almost the same measurement — a difference too small to notice. Drag the slider to move forward in time.

hot cold both start here
0.2°C apart
Almost identical. A forecast for tomorrow is worth trusting.

The widget is a schematic, not real weather data. It shows the pattern: the gap between the two lines grows faster with each day. This is why a forecast for the next few hours is usually accurate, while a forecast for a particular day next month is not possible. The model is not the problem. The limit comes from the growth of small measurement errors.

A message spreads online: “Food becomes harmful if eaten during an eclipse.” How would you check this claim?

Start with what an eclipse is. During a solar eclipse, the Moon passes between the Sun and the Earth and blocks some sunlight. Nothing else reaches the food.

  • What changes for the food? The light level drops, and the air temperature may fall by a few degrees for a few minutes.
  • Does food spoil in an ordinary shadow, or on a cloudy day, or at night? It does not spoil any faster.
  • Has anyone measured bacteria or toxins in food before and after an eclipse and found a difference?

There is no change in the food that could make it harmful, and no measurement showing one. The method was to ask what mechanism the claim needs, then check whether that mechanism exists.

SUN MOON EARTH An eclipse is a shadow. Nothing more.

Ask what the mechanism is. A solar eclipse is the Moon’s shadow falling on part of the Earth. Food in an ordinary shadow does not spoil, so an eclipse gives it no new way to become harmful.

Tested ideas still have limits

A law or model has been tested only over a certain range of conditions. Outside that range, it may fail. More precise measurements can also reveal small errors that were hidden before.

When that happens, an idea is changed or replaced because of the new evidence, not because of anyone’s opinion. No scientific idea is beyond testing.

Check what you have understood

1In science, a prediction is…

A prediction comes from a stated law or model and measured inputs. That is why it can be explained and checked.

2Which question is the most useful for testing “it will rain today”?

It names a measurable quantity and compares it with a past record. The others are yes-or-no, a matter of description, or a matter of opinion.

3A careful measurement does not match a prediction. What is the scientific response?

Something in the chain is wrong. Checking each link in turn finds where the error is.

4Which of these make “it will rain this afternoon” testable?

More than one answer is correct.

Humidity, wind and pressure give numbers that can be compared with records. “Frightening” is a judgement, and two people could answer differently.

5Why is a weather forecast for the next few hours more reliable than one for next month?

The atmosphere is a chaotic system. A starting difference too small to measure grows until, after one to two weeks, two forecasts disagree completely.

6To check the claim that food becomes harmful during an eclipse, the best first question is…

Ask for the mechanism and the measurement. An eclipse only blocks some sunlight for a few minutes, and food in shadow does not spoil faster.

7A well-tested law may still fail when…

A law is reliable within its tested range. New conditions and more precise measurements are where its limits show.

8Scientists reject an idea not because of opinion, but because of ____.

Evidence: a measurement that disagrees with the idea and survives checking.

Next: how to get a useful answer when exact numbers are not available.

‹ Previous: Laws, theories and principles Next: The art of estimation ›